Thinker · TH-0141
Elizabeth Anscombe
G. E. M. Anscombe was a British philosopher, born in Limerick, who studied with Wittgenstein, translated his Philosophical Investigations, and later held his former…
Also known as G. E. M. Anscombe, Gertrude Elizabeth Margaret Anscombe
1919 – 2001 · Limerick; Oxford; Cambridge
Traditions: Analytic
Schools: Virtue ethics (modern)
G. E. M. Anscombe was a British philosopher, born in Limerick, who studied with Wittgenstein, translated his Philosophical Investigations, and later held his former chair at Cambridge. Her book Intention reshaped the philosophy of action, and her essay 'Modern Moral Philosophy' attacked talk of moral obligation detached from a divine lawgiver, helping revive virtue ethics. She also argued that deliberately killing the innocent is murder, and that causation can be observed.
Key ideas
- Intentional actions are those, known without observation, to which a certain sense of the question 'Why?' applies, asking for the agent's reasons.
- Moral 'ought' without a lawgiver is a survival from an abandoned framework; ethics needs moral psychology and the virtues.
- Deliberately killing the innocent, as a means or an end, is always murder.
- Causation need not involve necessity or universal laws, and can be perceived.
Major works
- Mr Truman's Degree (pamphlet)
- Intention (1957)
- "Modern Moral Philosophy" (1958)
- Causality and Determination (1971)
In the conversation
- Question What is the difference between my arm rising and my raising it? A capoeirista asks
- Discussion Wang Yangming’s unity of knowing and acting, read alongside Anscombe
- Debate Anscombe was right: we see causing all the time
- Question If virtue ethics says ‘do what the virtuous person would do’, how does a beginner use that?
- Discussion ‘Killing robbers is not killing people’: the Later Mohists on inferences that fail
- Debate Double effect is a genuine moral distinction, not a lawyer’s trick for doing harm with clean hands
- Debate The deviant causal chain shows the causal theory of action cannot be repaired
- Debate Anscombe was right: no emergency makes it permissible to target civilians deliberately
- Question Accident or intent: how should a court decide what someone actually did?