Skip to content
Coordinates of ThoughtHome of Philosophy
Join
Question · Open Newcomer-friendly

The rains came late three years running. My neighbour says it is fate, my son says it is the climate. Can both be right?

Its coordinates: 1.4.2 Causation

Three years now the rains near Kumasi have come late, and my cocoa trees flowered and dropped their flowers. The old man on the next farm says it is our nkrabea, the destiny each of us brings into the world. He says there is no use fighting it.

My son at university sends me graphs. He says the rains are late because the climate is changing, and that farmers everywhere are seeing the same.

I believe my son's graphs. But my neighbour's answer is not stupid. The graphs tell me why the rains are late everywhere. They do not tell me why my farm was the one that lost its flowers when the farm beyond the river did not.

I read that the philosopher Kwame Gyekye wrote about how Akan thinking accepts natural causes but still asks another question after them. I don't know if I have understood him.

So:

  • Are my neighbour and my son answering the same question?
  • If they are answering different questions, is one of the questions a bad one?
  • When something bad happens to you and not to others, is "why me?" a question with an answer?

I am new to this. Simple words, please.

LikeAnswerFollow1 answer

Join the conversation: members reply here, and joining is free. Reading is always free.

Join free to reply Sign in

1 answer

  1. Titilayo Adeyemi

    Fellow

    You have understood Gyekye well, I think. There is a famous example from the Azande in central Africa, described by an English anthropologist. A granary collapses because termites have eaten its supports, and it kills the people sitting under it in the shade. The Azande knew perfectly well about termites. What they asked was why these people were sitting there at this moment.

    Your son answers the termite question. Your neighbour answers the other one. In Yoruba we have orí, the destiny of the inner head, which answers it too. I don't think the second question is bad. I think science declines to answer it, which is not the same thing.