Thanksgiving Monday: can gratitude be owed, or does owing it spoil it?
Its coordinates: 3.2.3 Character-Based Approaches
It's Thanksgiving Monday here in Canada, and I'm writing this with leftover turkey and a mild headache from yesterday's family dinner, where my aunt kept a running total of who had thanked whom for what. My cousin hadn't thanked her for a wedding gift two years ago, and that came up between the potatoes and the pie.
It got me thinking about whether gratitude can be owed.
Seneca's On Benefits is good on this. He thinks a benefit lies in the giver's intention rather than in the object, and he argues that ingratitude, though shameful, shouldn't be something you can take someone to court over: a benefit given with an eye to repayment is a loan. He also has the rule that the giver should forget the gift at once and the receiver should never forget it. My aunt has the second half the wrong way round.
Adam Smith treats gratitude as the natural counterpart of resentment: just as resentment moves us to punish, gratitude moves us to reward. That makes it sound like something closer to a debt.
In our tradition, the gratitude I grew up with is aimed first at God, not at a person, and is supposed to hold even when things go badly. Which makes the aunt's ledger look even stranger.
So: when we say someone "owes" thanks, are we describing a real obligation, or a social debt that would be better left unwritten?