Skip to content
Coordinates of ThoughtHome of Philosophy
Join

Book corner · Philosophy · Advanced

Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus

Logisch-philosophische Abhandlung

Ludwig Wittgenstein · 1921 (English 1922) · Short (under 150 pages)

4.5 from 2 reviews

+ Add to my shelf

Be the first to put it on your shelf.

What it is

The only philosophical book Wittgenstein published in his lifetime, written largely during his service in the First World War and published in German in 1921 and in English, with an introduction by Bertrand Russell, in 1922. Its numbered remarks hang from seven main propositions. The world is the totality of facts, not of things. Propositions are pictures of possible states of affairs, sharing a logical form with what they depict; complex propositions are truth-functions of elementary ones, and the propositions of logic are tautologies that say nothing. What can be said at all can be said clearly, but logical form itself cannot be said, only shown. Ethics, aesthetics, the meaning of life and the metaphysical subject lie outside what can be said. In the closing remarks Wittgenstein calls his own propositions nonsense, a ladder to be thrown away once climbed, and ends by enjoining silence about what cannot be spoken of.

Why read it

It shaped logical positivism and analytic philosophy of language, and its final pages pose in sharp form the question of what philosophy can say about value and meaning.

Where to start

Read the seven main propositions on their own first, then the 4s on picturing, and finally the remarks from 6.4 onward on ethics and the mystical.

Original text in the public domain; free translations exist online Read the Ogden translation free at Project Gutenberg

Reviews

  1. Oskar Nyberg

    I read it with my evening class every other year and I am still not sure whether the ending is a confession that nothing important can be said or a claim that the important things show themselves. Resolute and traditional readers have fought about this for decades. Read the Pears and McGuinness translation, then compare a few remarks with Ogden's; they diverge in illuminating ways.

  2. Tomasz Szewczak

    What still amazes me is the truth-table method, presented in the 4s and 5s almost as an aside. The picture theory is probably false, and the later Wittgenstein says so. But the book's demand that everything sayable be said clearly is a discipline I try to practise. It is short, and you will reread it for years.