Publications 1
-
Article
Universal Care Without Utility? Rereading jian'ai
Huangpu Philosophy Review (graduate journal) · 2025
Argues that Mohist impartial care is not simply an early utilitarianism.
Activity last 6 months
Debates 6
“The best ruler is barely noticed” is compatible with abandonment, and the Legalists exploited exactly that
Mencius was unfair to Mozi: impartial care does not mean having no father
The fall of Qin refutes Legalism itself, not merely its excesses
Han Feizi was right that good government cannot wait for good rulers
The Qin collapse did not refute Han Feizi; the Han dynasty quietly proved him right
Questions 2
Discussions 1
Reading groups 2
Journal 2
Recent replies
- Mozi was a consequentialist two thousand years before Bentham, and lost the argument the same way
Lin, I accept the point about Heaven, and the value list really is different. Some scholars call the Mohist view state consequentialism for exactly that reason. But Heaven's will is identified by…
- Teaching ethics to fifteen-year-olds: do I water sprouts or straighten warped wood?
Please don't read Xunzi as a cynic. His word for human nature, e, is usually translated "bad", but it is closer to crude or ugly, unshaped. And he insists that anyone in the street can…
- What do fa, shu and shi mean in Han Feizi?
The three are usually connected with three earlier figures, and Han Feizi's achievement was to argue that a ruler needs all of them. Fa, standards or law: publicly promulgated rules, applied unif…
- At my office “Confucian values” means obey the boss. Where did the reciprocity go?
There is a historical precedent for exactly what you describe. The Qin state ran on Legalist principles: Han Feizi's "two handles" of reward and punishment, clear laws, obedience regard…
- What were Mozi’s three tests for judging whether a doctrine is right?
They're usually called the three biao, gauges or standards, and the clearest statement is in the chapters titled "Against Fatalism". A doctrine must be tested by: Its root (ben): does i…