Skip to content
Coordinates of ThoughtHome of Philosophy
Join

Card 3.2.1 · Root III — Ethics and Axiology

Consequence-Based Approaches

If an act produces the best outcome, can it be wrong?

Consequentialism holds that an act's rightness depends entirely on its outcomes — nothing about the act itself matters except what it brings about.

From The Coordinates of Thought by Syed Raheel Shahzad, card 3.2.1, page 142

On this card
  1. Where it sits
  2. The rival answers
  3. Where do you stand?
  4. Key figures
  5. Talk about it here
  6. Connections

Where it sits

Under 3.2 Normative ethics. Borders 3.5 Value theory, 6.5 Philosophy of economics.

New to ethics? Read the guide

The rival answers

VariantClaim
Act utilitarianismEach act judged by its own outcomes
Rule utilitarianismFollow rules whose general adoption maximises good
Negative utilitarianismMinimise suffering rather than maximise wellbeing
Preference utilitarianismMaximise satisfied preferences, not felt pleasure
Mohist consequentialismJudge by impartial benefit to all, tested against effects
Motive consequentialismAssess motives by the outcomes of having them

Where do you stand?

If an act produces the best outcome, can it be wrong?

One tap, no sign-up. You can change your answer at any time. Answers are counted anonymously.

Key figures

FigureDatesTraditionContribution
Mozic. 470–391 BCEChineseImpartial benefit; an early systematic consequentialism
Jeremy Bentham1748–1832European modernThe felicific calculus
J. S. Mill1806–1873European modernHigher and lower pleasures; a reply to the pig objection
Henry Sidgwick1838–1900European modernA systematic formulation, with the unresolved dualism of practical reason
Peter Singerb. 1946AnalyticApplied consequentialism; expanding the moral circle
Bernard Williams1929–2003AnalyticThe integrity objection

Talk about it here

Conversations about this question in Moral theories:

Join free to ask about it Everything in Moral theories

Connections

→ 3.2 · ↔ 3.5, 3.3.2, 6.5, 3.2.2 · ◇ act utilitarianism, rule utilitarianism, negative utilitarianism, Mohism · ○ Axial Age; Early modern; Modern; Table 5

→ depends on · ↔ borders: genuine overlap, neither prior · ◇ answered by: points from question to answers · ○ appears in: points to the timeline and the comparisons

The full card is in the book

In The Coordinates of Thought this card goes on to a worked example that sets the answers against one case, and to where the question touches daily life — page 142.

About the book Get the book