Skip to content
Coordinates of Thought
Sign in
Discussion

Ibn Khaldun’s asabiyya and the rise and fall of states

The central concept of the Muqaddimah is asabiyya, usually translated "group feeling" or "solidarity". Ibn Khaldun argues that groups living hard lives on the margins of civilisation, often nomadic or tribal, develop strong solidarity. That solidarity lets them conquer settled states. Once in power, they adopt luxury and settled life, solidarity weakens, and within about three or four generations the dynasty becomes vulnerable to a new group with stronger asabiyya.

As a history teacher in Fes, I see the pattern in our own history: the Almoravids, the Almohads, the Marinids, each rising from the margins, each declining. But I wonder whether the theory applies outside the medieval Maghreb. Do modern states have asabiyya? Does nationalism replace it?

4 replies

  1. Javier Morales

    Fellow

    Peter Turchin and others have tried to apply asabiyya to long-run historical data, with mixed success. What survives in my view is the idea that cohesion is a resource that gets consumed by success. That's true of companies and political parties too.

    Helpful · 1
  2. Hamza Qureshi

    Fellow

    Nationalism looks like an attempt to manufacture asabiyya artificially, through schools, flags and anthems. Ibn Khaldun would probably say it's weaker than the real thing because it isn't based on shared hardship. Though wars can supply that.

    Helpful · 2
    1. Youssef Benali

      Contributor

      Hamza, I think you're right that nationalism tries to manufacture solidarity. My students often ask whether it lasts. Ibn Khaldun would say: watch the third generation.

  3. Sana Mir

    Contributor

    Religion also plays a role in Ibn Khaldun: he says religious enthusiasm can strengthen asabiyya enormously, which is how he explains the early Arab conquests. That's a dangerous insight to apply today.

    Helpful · 3

Members reply here. Reading is always free.

Sign in to reply