Skip to content
Coordinates of ThoughtHome of Philosophy
Join
Question · Explain Newcomer-friendly

Why is saying “I promise” not true or false, like other sentences?

Its coordinates: 6.10 Philosophy of Language · 6.10.1 Reference · 6.10.2 Speech Acts

I found an idea I don't fully understand.

The book says that when I tell my mother "I promise I'll be home by ten", I am not describing anything. I am not reporting a promise that exists somewhere else. Saying it is the promising. So the sentence is not true or false.

But it feels true or false to me. If I come home at midnight, my mother will say I lied. Isn't that the same as saying my sentence was false?

Also, what is the difference between saying "I promise to come" and just "I will come"? Both tell her what I plan to do.

Sorry if this is basic. I would like to understand it properly before I read more.

LikeAnswerFollow3 answers

Join the conversation: members reply here, and joining is free. Reading is always free.

Join free to reply Sign in

3 answers

Accepted answer

  1. Rowena Abellana

    ✓ Accepted answer Fellow

    Not basic at all, Fajar: this is where J. L. Austin started.

    Austin noticed that some sentences, said in the right circumstances, do something rather than describe it: "I promise", "I name this ship". He called them performatives. Say "I promise to be home by ten" seriously, to someone who hears you, and you have not reported a promise. You have made one. It did not exist before you spoke, so there is nothing for the sentence to be true of.

    What can go wrong, if not falsity? Austin says it can be "unhappy": it may misfire (said in a play, or by someone without standing) or be abused (said insincerely). An insincere promise is still a promise; that is why your mother can hold you to it.

    At midnight she is not saying the promise was false. She is saying you broke it, and perhaps that you were insincere, since promising implies you intend to keep it.

    "I will come" is a prediction and can simply turn out wrong. "I promise to come" binds you. The difference is the obligation.

    One caution: later in the same lectures Austin decided that stating is also a kind of doing, so his sharp line between "doing" and "describing" did not survive his own book.

    Helpful · 3
    1. Fajar Nugroho

      Fellow

      Thank you both. So my promise can't be false, but the intention it implies can be missing, and that is what my mother would really be angry about. That makes sense. I will look for Austin's lectures.

      Helpful · 1

Other answers

  1. Eliana Halpern

    Fellow

    Rowena's answer is lovely. A small addition from my own tradition, which thought hard about this long before Austin. Jewish law treats vows as acts done with the mouth: a vow is created by speech, and the rabbis worried enough about rash vows that the Yom Kippur evening service opens with Kol Nidre, a formula about vows. They also asked whether a commitment made only "in the heart" counts, and on the whole they said it does not. Promising is something you do out loud, to someone.