Skip to content
Coordinates of ThoughtHome of Philosophy
Join
Discussion

Orí and the Stoic cylinder: does a destiny you chose make you more free or less?

In Yoruba thought, before birth each person chooses an orí, literally a "head", meaning the inner self that carries one's destiny. One of the words for destiny, àkúnlẹ̀yàn, means something like "that which was chosen kneeling". You chose it, but you cannot remember choosing it, and once born you cannot exchange it.

My grandmother used this to explain both success and misfortune. It always struck me as a strange mixture: fate, because the destiny is fixed before you act; and freedom, because it was your choice. There are also stories where a person's effort, or neglect, makes a good destiny fail or a poor one improve, so the fixing is not total.

Recently a friend sent me Chrysippus's cylinder, the Stoic image reported by Cicero: push a cylinder and it rolls, push a cone and it spins, because how a thing moves depends on its shape, not only on the push. Fate supplies the push; character supplies the shape.

Both pictures try to make room for responsibility inside a fixed order. But they do it differently. The Stoic says the shape is you; the Yoruba says the destiny was chosen by you. I am curious whether people think either succeeds, and whether there are other traditions with a third way of doing it.

LikeReplyFollow5 replies

Members reply here. Reading is always free.

Sign in to reply

5 replies

  1. Kwame Asante

    Fellow

    The Akan picture is a close neighbour. The ɔkra, the life-soul, comes from Onyame and carries a destiny (nkrabea) given before birth. Gyekye, if I remember his chapter on destiny rightly, argued that the Akan view leaves room for choice because the destiny is general, fixing the broad shape of a life but not each decision. Wiredu would have pressed whether the concept of destiny there is really a causal concept at all, or more a way of interpreting a life afterwards. I lean towards the second reading: destiny-talk is retrospective sense-making as much as prediction.

  2. Giulia Ferrante

    Fellow

    Lovely parallel. A detail on the cylinder: Cicero reports it in On Fate, and the point of the analogy is to separate "antecedent" causes (the push) from "principal" causes (the cylinder's own nature). Chrysippus wanted assent, our agreeing to an impression, to be like the rolling: prompted from outside, but carried out by our own nature. So the Stoic answer is "the shape is you", as you say. There's no moment of choosing the shape.

    Helpful · 1
  3. Elin Lindqvist

    Fellow

    There is a harsher Stoic image too, reported much later: a dog tied to a cart. If it follows willingly, it is pulled and also follows; if it resists, it is dragged anyway. That one I find less consoling than the cylinder. It suggests the only freedom is in the attitude, not the path. On night shifts that is sometimes all I have, so I don't dismiss it.

    Helpful · 2
  4. Akosua Mensah

    Contributor

    I grow cocoa. Whether the rains come is not mine. Whether I prune and weed is mine. My father said a farmer who blames the weather for weeds is lying. I think that is what your stories of effort are saying, Titilayo: destiny is the weather, character is the weeding. People call it fate when they mean the part they could not touch.

    Helpful · 3
  5. Titilayo Adeyemi

    Fellow

    Akosua, that is close to what my grandmother meant, and close to the Yoruba image of the legs: the head may carry a destiny, but it is the legs that walk you towards it or away from it.

    Kwame, I like the retrospective reading, and I think it explains why the Yoruba version needs the prenatal choice. If destiny were only imposed, retrospective sense-making would breed resentment. Because it was chosen, misfortune becomes something to understand and work with, not only to endure. Perhaps the "choice" is doing ethical work more than metaphysical work.