Kierkegaard’s leap of faith: irrational, or beyond reason?
In Fear and Trembling (1843), written under the pseudonym Johannes de Silentio, Kierkegaard considers Abraham, who is ready to sacrifice Isaac at God's command. Johannes can't understand Abraham. He calls this a "teleological suspension of the ethical": Abraham's relation to God goes beyond the universal demands of ethics.
In Concluding Unscientific Postscript (1846), the pseudonym Johannes Climacus says that truth is subjectivity and that faith involves passionate commitment in the face of objective uncertainty.
People call this "irrationalism". But I'm not sure. Kierkegaard seems to think reason has limits, and that faith is what happens at those limits, not a rejection of reason. Is there a real difference between "against reason" and "beyond reason"? Or is that just a nicer way of saying the same thing?