How did Cynicism turn into Stoicism? What did Zeno keep from Crates, and what did he drop?

Question

I'm a startup founder in Mumbai, recently burnt out, and reading my way back via the Stoics. Everywhere I read that Stoicism "grew out of" Cynicism, and that Zeno, the founder of Stoicism, studied with the Cynic Crates.
But the two seem so different in practice. Diogenes lived in a large jar and insulted everyone. Marcus Aurelius ran an empire. Seneca was enormously rich. If the Stoics were Cynics' heirs, what exactly did they inherit, and what did they throw away?
Simple, accurate answers please. I've already read too many listicles that confuse the two.

Giulia Ferrante · Accepted Answer

Rohan, the short version is that the Stoics kept the Cynic ethics and added a system.
The line: Diogenes Laertius tells us Zeno came to Athens after a shipwreck, read about Socrates in a bookshop and was pointed to Crates, a Cynic who had given away a fortune. Zeno studied with him, then with others, and eventually taught in the Painted Stoa, the Stoa Poikilē, which gave the school its name. There was even a joke that Zeno's early Republic, with its very Cynic proposals, was written "on the dog's tail" (the Cynics were "dogs").
What they kept: that virtue alone is sufficient for happiness; that wealth, reputation and health are not truly good; that the wise person is a citizen of the cosmos rather than of a city; and that living according to nature is the goal.
What they changed: the Cynics had no interest in theory. The Stoics built a logic and a physics, a providential, rational cosmos, to ground the ethics. And they softened the indifference to externals with the doctrine of "preferred indifferents": health and wealth are not good, but it is reasonable to prefer them. That doctrine is what lets a Stoic be an emperor or a millionaire without hypocrisy, and what a Cynic would have mocked.

Elin Lindqvist · Answer

Epictetus is worth reading on this. He has a whole discourse on the true Cynic, and he treats Cynicism as a calling only a few can bear: a messenger sent to show people where they've gone wrong, owning nothing, with no family. He admired it and didn't recommend it to his students. That ambivalence is the Stoic attitude in miniature.

Nikos Stavridis · Answer

The Cynic tradition didn't end when Stoicism absorbed it. Cynics were still wandering the Roman Empire centuries later. The emperor Julian, in the fourth century, wrote speeches attacking the Cynics of his own day as shabby imitators of Diogenes, which shows both that they were still around and that the image of Diogenes still carried authority.

Rohan Desai · Answer

This clears up a lot. So Stoicism is Cynic ethics plus a cosmology plus "preferred indifferents". That last idea is probably why it appeals to people like me: it lets you keep your company. Whether that's wisdom or a loophole, I'll leave for another thread.

How did Cynicism turn into Stoicism? What did Zeno keep from Crates, and what did he drop?

4 answers

Accepted answer

Other answers