Skip to content
Coordinates of ThoughtHome of Philosophy
Join

Book corner · Intermediate

The Way of the Bodhisattva

Bodhicaryāvatāra

Śāntideva · c. 8th century CE · Medium (150–350 pages)

4.5 from 2 reviews · 40 views

+ Add to my shelf

Be the first to put it on your shelf.

What it is

A verse guide to the bodhisattva path by Śāntideva, traditionally a monk at the monastic university of Nālandā. Its ten chapters move from praise of the awakening mind (bodhicitta), the resolve to attain awakening for the sake of all beings, through confession, vigilance and mindfulness, to the perfections. The chapter on patience analyses anger and argues that it makes no sense to hate an attacker who is driven by causes beyond his control, any more than one hates the stick he strikes with. The meditation chapter develops the equality and exchange of self and other: suffering is to be removed simply because it is suffering, whoever's it is, since the self that would make it 'mine' is a construction. The wisdom chapter defends Madhyamaka emptiness against other Buddhist schools. It closes with a long dedication of merit to the welfare of all.

Why read it

Few texts join argument and devotion so tightly, and its case for impartial concern, built on the unreality of the self, is a striking counterpart to Western arguments about egoism and altruism.

Where to start

Read chapter 6 on patience and chapter 8 on meditation first, then return to the opening chapters; leave the wisdom chapter until last.

Original text in the public domain

Reviews

  1. Ethan Mercer

    I came to this from effective altruism, after someone told me Śāntideva argued for impartiality more than a thousand years before Sidgwick. The argument is different: he dissolves the self rather than adding up welfare. But chapter 8's claim that pain should be removed because it is pain, not because it is mine, is the cleanest version of the idea I have read.

  2. Brian Otieno Ouma

    Chapter 6, on patience, is the one I bring to the prison. The argument that you do not get angry at the stick but at the man, when the man was driven by his anger as the stick was by his hand, provokes real argument among men who have been both the stick and the hand. Some of them hate it. All of them remember it.