Skip to content
Coordinates of ThoughtHome of Philosophy
Join

Book corner · Intermediate

The Structure of Iki

Iki no kōzō (「いき」の構造)

Kuki Shūzō · 1930 · Short (under 150 pages)

4.5 from 2 reviews · 29 views

+ Add to my shelf

Be the first to put it on your shelf.

What it is

A short book in which Kuki Shūzō, who had studied in Europe with Rickert and Heidegger and met Bergson, analyses iki, an aesthetic and ethical style that took shape in the pleasure quarters of late Edo, roughly a refined, unattached chic. Kuki argues that iki has three moments: allure toward the other sex (bitai), a proud, spirited resistance inherited from the samurai ethos (ikiji), and a Buddhist-tinged resignation or detachment (akirame). He maps iki against neighbouring taste concepts, such as the refined, the showy, the plain, the sweet and the astringent, on a geometric figure, and traces its natural expressions in posture, voice and dress and its artistic expressions in vertical stripes, subdued greys and browns, and architecture. He presents iki as untranslatable, an expression of the being of a particular people, a claim critics have linked to the cultural nationalism of the period.

Why read it

It is the classic phenomenology of a single aesthetic concept, and a test case for whether ideas of taste can travel between cultures.

Where to start

Read the introduction on method and the chapter analysing the structure of iki, then study the figure of taste concepts with a pencil in hand.

Reviews

  1. Rin Matsuda

    I draw picture books, and iki is something I try to put into a sleeve or a glance without ever naming it. Kuki names it, and the three moments, allure, pride and resignation, are uncannily right. His insistence that it belongs to the Japanese alone irritates me, partly because my European friends understand it perfectly well when I show them the right print.

  2. Claire Dubois

    As a translator I read it to see whether 'untranslatable' was an argument or a mood. It is a bit of both. Kuki's analysis is genuinely phenomenological, he learned from Heidegger and it shows, but the claim that iki belongs to the being of one people does work the analysis does not support. The pages on vertical stripes are a joy.