Skip to content
Coordinates of ThoughtHome of Philosophy
Join

Book corner · Intermediate

Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning

Seonghak sipdo (聖學十圖)

Yi Hwang (Toegye) · 1568 · Short (under 150 pages)

4.5 from 2 reviews · 39 views

+ Add to my shelf

Be the first to put it on your shelf.

What it is

Yi Hwang, known as Toegye, presented this work to the young King Seonjo of Joseon in 1568 as a compact course in self-cultivation for a ruler. It consists of ten diagrams, most adapted from earlier Chinese Neo-Confucians, each followed by quotations and Toegye's own comments. The first diagrams treat the cosmos and humanity's place in it: Zhou Dunyi's Diagram of the Supreme Ultimate and Zhang Zai's Western Inscription, which calls heaven father and earth mother. Others set out the curriculum of the Elementary Learning and the Great Learning, the rules of Zhu Xi's White Deer Grotto Academy, the relation of mind, nature and feelings, humaneness, and the learning of the mind-and-heart. The last diagrams concern reverent seriousness (gyeong) as the thread running through all practice, ending with an admonition for the daily round from rising early to retiring at night.

Why read it

It is the most influential work of Korean Neo-Confucianism, a whole philosophy of mind and practice designed to be seen at a glance and lived daily.

Where to start

Read the sixth diagram, on the mind combining nature and feelings, where Toegye's view in the Four-Seven Debate appears, in Michael Kalton's translation, To Become a Sage.

Original text in the public domain

Reviews

  1. Choi Byeong-hun

    As a Yulgok man I read Toegye's diagrams the way a supporter of a rival club watches the derby. I still think Yulgok had the better of the argument about principle and material force, but the diagram on reverent seriousness is a model of how to hold yourself together under pressure, which I needed in uniform more than I knew.

  2. Ji-woo Park

    Every Korean student has seen Toegye's face on the 1,000-won note; few have opened his book. I teach the sixth diagram to show my students that the Four-Seven Debate was not pedantry but a question about whether our best feelings have a different source from our ordinary ones. The final admonition on the daily routine is my favourite: philosophy as a timetable.