Skip to content
Coordinates of ThoughtHome of Philosophy
Join

Book corner · Intermediate

Instructions for Practical Living

Chuanxilu (傳習錄)

Wang Yangming (recorded by his disciples) · 16th century (first part published 1518) · Medium (150–350 pages)

4.5 from 2 reviews · 28 views

+ Add to my shelf

Be the first to put it on your shelf.

What it is

Records of conversations with Wang Yangming and letters he wrote to students, compiled by his disciples in three parts, the first published during his lifetime. It is the main source for the learning of the mind (xinxue), which challenged Zhu Xi's orthodoxy. Wang holds that the mind is principle: moral principles are not out in things waiting to be studied but present in the mind's own response to situations. Hence his famous unity of knowledge and action: no one who truly knows filial piety fails to act on it, just as seeing a lovely colour and loving it are a single event. He recounts how, as a young man, he tried to investigate the principle of bamboo by contemplating it for days until he fell ill, and he reinterprets the investigation of things as rectifying the mind's intentions. Later records develop the extension of innate knowing (liangzhi).

Why read it

It is the most influential challenge to Neo-Confucian orthodoxy, and its claim that knowing and doing are one is a live provocation for anyone who has known the right thing and not done it.

Where to start

Read Xu Ai's record at the start of Part I, then the bamboo story in Part III; Wing-tsit Chan's translation also includes Wang's Inquiry on the Great Learning.

Original text in the public domain

Reviews

  1. Lin Pei-shan

    I teach Wang to teenagers by asking who has ever known they should study and not studied. Every hand goes up. Then I tell them Wang says they did not really know, and the room erupts. The bamboo story makes him human. Chan's translation is old but reliable; I wish the letters in Part II were easier to follow without knowing the correspondents.

  2. Henrike Vogel

    I came from Kant, for whom knowing the moral law and acting on it are very different matters, so Wang's unity of knowledge and action struck me at first as a confusion. It is a deliberate provocation. If you claim to know you should care for your parents and do not, Wang says you do not yet really know it. My moral-education group argued about it for two evenings.