Skip to content
Coordinates of ThoughtHome of Philosophy
Join

Book corner · Philosophy · Intermediate

Balanced Inquiries (Lunheng)

Lunheng (論衡)

Wang Chong · 1st century CE · Long (over 350 pages)

4.0 from 2 reviews

+ Add to my shelf

Be the first to put it on your shelf.

What it is

A large collection of essays, eighty-five in number with one lost, in which Wang Chong, a scholar of modest official rank in the Eastern Han, tests the beliefs of his time against evidence and argument. His main target is the widely held view that Heaven responds to human conduct, and above all to the conduct of rulers, by sending portents, prodigies and disasters. Wang argues that Heaven acts spontaneously and without purpose, that natural events have natural causes, and that the idea of a responsive Heaven projects human motives onto the cosmos. He criticises belief in ghosts, arguing that the dead do not become conscious spirits, since consciousness depends on the living body; he examines stories about sages; and in chapters questioning Confucius and criticising Mencius he points out inconsistencies in the revered texts themselves. Throughout he insists that claims be checked against evidence and effects.

Why read it

It is one of the great sceptical and naturalist works of the ancient world, and a reminder that the criticism of superstition is not the property of any one tradition.

Where to start

Sample the essays on death and ghosts, on spontaneity, and on Confucius and Mencius rather than reading from the start; Alfred Forke's early translation is complete and freely available.

Original text in the public domain; free translations exist online Read it free at the Chinese Text Project

Reviews

  1. Liu Mingqiao

    I wanted to like it more. Wang Chong is right that Heaven does not send floods to punish bad ministers, and his naturalism sits well with my reading of Zhuangzi. But dozens of essays of correction become tiring, and he can be as dogmatic about fate as the people he mocks. Read selections.

  2. Arvind Poojary

    I give talks exposing miracle tricks in villages and was delighted to find a first-century Chinese official doing the same job with better arguments. His case against ghosts, that if all the dead became spirits they would crowd the roads and outnumber the living, is something I now borrow, with credit. He is repetitive and sometimes credulous himself, but the method is the point.