Card 5.8 · Root V — Aesthetics

Philosophy of Music and Literature

How can a piece of music be sad?

This node asks how the arts that do not depict — music above all — convey anything, and what literature does that other forms cannot.

From The Coordinates of Thought by Syed Raheel Shahzad, card 5.8, page 241

On this card

Where it sits
The rival answers
Key figures
Connections
On Coordinates of Thought

Where it sits

Under V. Aesthetics. Borders 5.5 Aesthetic experience, 6.23 Philosophy of emotion, 6.10 Philosophy of language.

The rival answers

Position	How music expresses
Arousal theory	It causes the emotion in listeners
Resemblance theory	Its contours resemble the behaviour of a person in that state
Persona theory	We hear an imagined subject whose expression it is
Formalism	It expresses nothing; the emotion-talk is loose
Cognitivist	Sadness is a property the music has, heard rather than felt

Key figures

Figure	Dates	Tradition	Contribution
Confucius	trad. 551–479 BCE	Chinese	Music as formative of character and social order
Al-Farabi	c. 870–950	Islamic	Kitab al-Musiqa; theory of music and its effects
Eduard Hanslick	1825–1904	Austrian	Musical formalism; tonally moving forms
Peter Kivy	1934–2017	Analytic	Resemblance theory; the sad Saint Bernard
Martha Nussbaum	b. 1947	Analytic	Literature as moral knowledge

Connections

→ 5.2, 5.5 · ↔ 6.23, 3.2.3, 3.2.5, 6.10 · ◇ formalism, resemblance theory, persona theory · ○ Axial Age; Islamic golden age; Modern; Table 10

→ narrower questions · ↔ questions it borders · ◇ the positions, mapped in Part III of the book · ○ the eras and comparison tables (Parts IV and V)

The full card is in the book

In The Coordinates of Thought this card goes on to a worked example that sets the answers against one case, and to where the question touches daily life — page 241.

About the book Get the book

On Coordinates of Thought

Conversations about this question in Music & literature:

Join free to ask about it Everything in Music & literature