Skip to content
Coordinates of ThoughtHome of Philosophy
Join

Book corner · Advanced

Ethics (Rinrigaku)

Rinrigaku (倫理学)

Watsuji Tetsurō · 1937–1949 · Long (over 350 pages)

4.5 from 2 reviews · 39 views

+ Add to my shelf

Be the first to put it on your shelf.

What it is

Watsuji Tetsurō's three-volume system of ethics, built on an analysis of the Japanese word for human being, ningen, written with characters meaning 'human' and 'between'. Watsuji argues that a human being is never simply an individual: we exist in betweenness (aidagara), in relationships such as parent and child, friends, colleagues and fellow citizens. Ethics is therefore the study of the patterns that make shared life possible, not of an isolated will, and Watsuji criticises modern Western ethics for starting from the solitary individual. He develops this as a double negation: the individual becomes itself by negating the group, and fulfils itself by negating that independence and returning to the whole. Later volumes extend the analysis to family, community, economy and the state, and his treatment of the nation has been criticised as accommodating wartime nationalism. The available English translation covers only part of the work.

Why read it

It is the most systematic relational ethics in modern philosophy, and a direct challenge to theories that begin from the isolated individual.

Where to start

Read the opening chapter on the meaning of ningen and betweenness, which carries the core argument, before the longer analyses.

Reviews

  1. Aroha Tipene

    Our school teaches that you are never only yourself but also your relations, your whakapapa. Watsuji makes a careful philosophical argument for something similar from the Japanese word for a human being. Heavy reading for a schoolteacher, and I needed the introduction to get through it, but it gave me words to use when my students ask why our river can be a person.

  2. Thandeka Mokoena

    I read it after years of arguing ubuntu cases, because a colleague said Watsuji was saying something similar from Japan. He is, and he is not. Betweenness is close to the idea that a person is a person through other persons, but the double negation gives the individual more room than people expect. The material on the state worried me; the opening chapter is superb.