Skip to content
Coordinates of ThoughtHome of Philosophy
Join
Discussion

Does contemplating death dissolve the fear, or does it just stop us arguing about it?

In the Theravāda tradition we practise maraṇasati, mindfulness of death. Buddhaghosa's Path of Purification gives it a full treatment among the recollections, and there is a sutta where monks tell the Buddha how they practise it, hoping to live for a day and a night, or for one meal. He praises only those who recollect death across the span of a single mouthful or a single breath.

I've practised it for twelve years. I want to be honest about what it has and hasn't done.

The philosophical treatments of death I've read here, Epicurus, Nagel, Williams, ask whether death is bad. The Buddhist analysis doesn't answer that question. It relocates it. Fear of death is one form of craving for permanence; the remedy is not an argument but a practice that weakens the craving. Al-Ghazālī's remembrance of death works similarly, as a discipline rather than a solution.

But here is my worry. When people tell me the practice has made them unafraid of death, I sometimes suspect it has done something smaller: it has made the question boring. They've thought "this body will die" so many thousands of times that it has lost its sting the way any repeated word does. Is that liberation, or habituation?

People who sit with the dying, and anyone with a practice of their own, religious or Stoic or none: what have you seen?

LikeReplyFollow6 replies

Join the conversation: members reply here, and joining is free. Reading is always free.

Join free to reply Sign in

6 replies

  1. Elin Hedqvist

    Fellow

    I've been with a lot of people when they died, and I can tell you that familiarity doesn't make me unafraid of my own death. It makes me unafraid of death in general, which is different. Marcus Aurelius does something similar: he reminds himself constantly that emperors and their slaves both died, and that seems to me to shrink death to its true size rather than remove the fear. Your habituation worry is real for that kind of practice.

    Helpful · 3
  2. Nadia Haddad

    Fellow

    I'd distinguish two fears. Epicurus helped me with one: the fear of being dead, which is confused, since there's no one there to suffer it. He did nothing for the other: the fear of dying, of pain, of leaving my children. Maybe maraṇasati works on the second in a way arguments can't.

    1. Nirmala Jayasekara

      Fellow

      Nadia, I think you're right that the arguments and the practice address different fears. The texts would say the practice goes further, to the craving underneath both. But I've learned to be modest about how far my own practice has gone.

      Helpful · 1
  3. Rohan Desai

    Fellow

    I came at this through burnout, not illness. When I was running my startup I was terrified of the company dying, and that fear organised my whole life. When I started reading the Gita and the Stoics, the first thing that changed wasn't the fear but its grip on my decisions. I'd call that neither liberation nor habituation. More like the fear stopped holding the steering wheel.

    Helpful · 2
  4. Nima Tsering Gurung

    Fellow

    On the Annapurna circuit the mountains do maraṇasati for you. Every season someone doesn't come back. The monks in Manang taught me to say the prayers as we pass the memorial stones, and I think the point isn't to stop being afraid. It's to stop being surprised. That's a smaller thing than enlightenment, but it changes how you treat the person walking beside you.

    Helpful · 3
    1. Nirmala Jayasekara

      Fellow

      "Stop being surprised" is very good, Nima. Maybe habituation isn't a failure after all, if what becomes habitual is the truth. I'll keep the worry, but more lightly.