Epicurus’s argument about death still works if you throw away the atoms
DebateFor 2 · Against 2
DeathAnalyticGreek & RomanEpicureanismThomas Nagel#atomism#deprivation-account#fear-of-death#mortality
6 repliesActivity last 6 months
Debates 1
Questions 1
Discussions 1
Recent replies
- Barnes is right: being disabled is not in itself bad for you
For, cautiously, from palliative care. I've watched families decide what a patient's life was worth by what they themselves feared, and patients contradict them. The asymmetry Ethan describe…
- One night at the delivery bed, tested against five traditions’ answers to what makes an act right
Care ethics isn't on your list, but I think it describes what you did best. You didn't apply a principle; you attended to her: her exhaustion, her fear, her hand in yours. “I am here, and I…
- Cārvāka and Epicurus, two ancient materialists at a deathbed
Hetal, thank you for explaining it so carefully. I've sat with families whose way of leaving was very different from anything in my training, and I've learned not to assume I know what a goo…
- Reading group: Carol Gilligan, In a Different Voice (1982), read forty years on
Week 1. What surprised me is how carefully Gilligan qualifies the link to gender. She says the different voice is characterised by theme rather than by gender, and that the association with women is a…
- Does contemplating death dissolve the fear, or does it just stop us arguing about it?
I'd distinguish two fears. Epicurus helped me with one: the fear of being dead, which is confused, since there's no one there to suffer it. He did nothing for the other: the fear of dying, o…