Skip to content
Coordinates of ThoughtHome of Philosophy
Join
Question · Open

Confucius refused to talk about death. Is declining a question a kind of answer?

Ji-woo Park Fellow
· 6 replies · 246 views
DeathChineseJapanese & KoreanConfucianismDaoismConfuciusXunziZhuangzi#ancestral-rites#confucius-on-death#declining-a-question#ritual
Follow

In Book 11 of the Analects, the disciple Zilu asks how to serve ghosts and spirits. Confucius says: you are not yet able to serve people, how could you serve spirits? Zilu asks about death. Confucius replies: you do not yet understand life, how could you understand death?

I teach ethics in Seoul, and my students find this either wise or evasive, usually evasive. But Korean families perform ancestral rites, jesa, several times a year, with a precise order of dishes on the table, bowing, a meal laid out for the dead. Confucius declined the metaphysical question, and the tradition built an enormous practice around death anyway.

Xunzi later said that in funeral rites we treat the dead as if they were still living, and that ritual gives form to grief without claiming anything about where the dead are.

So here's my question. Is Confucius's refusal a genuine position, ‘the question is premature or not ours to answer’, or a way of avoiding a question every tradition has to face? And can a practice like jesa make sense if you deliberately leave unanswered what happens to the person you're feeding?

LikeAnswer
Follow6 answers

Members reply here. Reading is always free.

Sign in to reply

6 answers

  1. Lin Pei-shan

    Contributor

    I teach classical Chinese in Taipei, and I read the refusal as a priority claim, not a dodge. Elsewhere in the Analects Confucius says to respect ghosts and spirits but keep them at a distance. The point is that obligations to the living come first, and that speculation about the dead can become a way of neglecting them. Jesa fits this perfectly: it's an obligation to the dead that strengthens the living family.

    Helpful · 2
  2. Liu Jianguo

    Contributor

    Zhuangzi gives a stranger answer. When his wife died, his friend found him drumming on a basin and singing. Zhuangzi explained that he had wept at first, then realised she had come from formlessness, through qi and form and life, and was now returning, like the seasons. That's not a refusal; it's an answer, and a very different one from Confucius's ritual seriousness.

    Helpful · 3
  3. Omar Farouk

    Fellow

    From Islam the question is not deferred at all: bodily resurrection and judgement are central. But I notice something similar in practice: much of Islamic teaching about death is about how to treat the dying and the dead, washing, prayer, quick burial, care for the bereaved. Even a tradition that answers the metaphysical question devotes most of its energy to Confucius's question: how to serve the living around a death.

    1. Ji-woo Park

      Fellow

      Omar, that's a good observation. Maybe every tradition has a metaphysics row and a practice row, and the tables only ever print the first.

      Helpful · 1
  4. Elin Lindqvist

    Fellow

    As a nurse I'd defend Confucius from experience. At the bedside, families who argue about the afterlife often miss the last days. Those who simply do the next right thing, sit, hold a hand, call the brother, often do better. ‘You don't yet understand life’ is something I'd like to say to some relatives, gently.

    Helpful · 2
  5. Khalid Mahmood Awan

    Fellow

    I'll take the other side, as a retired judge who has watched families split over inheritance and burial. A refusal to say what happens to the dead leaves room for every family's private theory, and those theories clash at funerals. Islamic law, at least, gives clear rules. Sometimes declining a question leaves the living to fight over it.

    Helpful · 3