Does translating philosophy change the philosophy?
I translate for a living, and philosophical texts are the ones that keep me up at night.
Heidegger's Dasein is left untranslated in English. Sartre's pour-soi becomes "for-itself", which sounds nothing like ordinary English. Hegel's Aufhebung becomes "sublation", a word English speakers learn only from Hegel. Each choice commits the reader to an interpretation before they've read a page.
Barbara Cassin's Dictionary of Untranslatables (French 2004, English 2014) is built on the idea that these words mark points where languages think differently.
So: do untranslatable terms show that language shapes philosophical thought? Or only that translators are cautious and readers are lazy?