Thesis Hume’s “true judges” are simply people with leisure, and Bourdieu showed it
Where it stands
Look at Hume's list of what makes a good critic: delicacy, practice, comparison, freedom from prejudice, good sense. Now ask who has the time to practise and compare. Not my father, who unloaded ships in Marseille for forty years and listened to the same twenty songs. Not most people on my crane shift.
Bourdieu's Distinction (1979) made this into a study. He surveyed what the French liked, from photographs to music to furniture, and found that taste lines up with class and education with embarrassing precision. His famous line, in the Richard Nice translation, is that taste classifies, and it classifies the classifier. Saying a song is vulgar tells everyone where you stand.
So my thesis: the "standard of taste" is a class standard dressed up as a universal one. Hume's qualifications are the qualifications of people who already had money and schooling, and the verdict of "true judges" over time is the verdict of the class that could afford to be judges.
I am not saying nothing is better than anything. I am saying that when someone calls a preference unsophisticated, they are usually telling you about their education, not about the work. Convince me otherwise.