Skip to content
Coordinates of ThoughtHome of Philosophy
Join

Book corner · Intermediate

Thinking About Mathematics: The Philosophy of Mathematics

Stewart Shapiro · 2000 · Medium (150–350 pages)

4.5 from 2 reviews · 26 views

+ Add to my shelf

Be the first to put it on your shelf.

What it is

An introduction to the philosophy of mathematics organised partly historically and partly by position. Shapiro begins with the questions of what mathematical objects are and how we can know about them, then surveys the main answers: Plato and Aristotle, Kant's account of mathematics as synthetic a priori, Mill's empiricism, the logicism of Frege and Russell, Hilbert's formalism, and Brouwer's intuitionism together with Dummett's later defence of it. He then turns to contemporary views, including Quine's argument that mathematics is indispensable to science, nominalist programmes that try to do without mathematical objects, and structuralism, Shapiro's own position, on which mathematics is the study of structures rather than of individual objects. Technical material is kept to a minimum, though a reader will benefit from knowing some logic.

Why read it

It is a fair and readable map of the competing answers to what mathematics is about and how we know it.

Where to start

Read the opening chapter on what the philosophy of mathematics is, then the chapter on logicism.

Reviews

  1. Vikram Sethi

    I teach proof to teenagers who ask 'but where are numbers?' and I finally have answers to offer them, plural. The historical chapters are especially clear. Some of the later material on nominalism went over my head, but I could follow the shape of the argument, which says something about how well it is written.

  2. Ana Clara Ferreira

    My thesis is on intuitionism, and Shapiro's chapter on Brouwer and Dummett is the one I give undergraduates to show them the position is not just a mathematician's eccentricity. He is a structuralist and says so, but the book is not a sales pitch. Best introduction to the field I know.