Skip to content
Coordinates of ThoughtHome of Philosophy
Join

Book corner · Advanced

The Ringstones of Wisdom (Fuṣūṣ al-ḥikam)

Fuṣūṣ al-ḥikam (فصوص الحكم)

Ibn ʿArabī · 1229 · Medium (150–350 pages)

3.5 from 2 reviews · 38 views

+ Add to my shelf

Be the first to put it on your shelf.

What it is

Ibn 'Arabī's most studied and most controversial work, which he says the Prophet Muhammad gave him in a vision in Damascus in 1229. Its twenty-seven chapters each set a 'ringstone' of wisdom in the name of a prophet, from Adam to Muhammad, with each prophet embodying a particular aspect of the divine names. Its central theme is God's self-disclosure in the world: creation as the manifestation of divine names that seek to be known, the human being as the place where those names are gathered, and Adam, in the first chapter, as the polishing of the mirror in which they are seen. It reinterprets familiar stories in startling ways, reading Noah's preaching, for instance, as a lesson in joining God's transcendence with God's immanence. Later readers associated the book with the doctrine called the oneness of being, a term Ibn 'Arabī himself never used.

Why read it

It is the central text of philosophical Sufism, and centuries of commentary, praise and condemnation have made it a touchstone for debates about God, the world and the self in Islamic thought.

Where to start

Read the chapter on Adam with a guide such as R. W. J. Austin's annotated translation, The Bezels of Wisdom; reading it unaided is very hard.

Original text in the public domain

Reviews

  1. Ratna Wulandari

    The old mystical poets of Java and the Malay world drew on this tradition, and I read the Fuṣūṣ to find the source. It is hard, much harder than the poetry, and Austin's notes were essential. What I took away for my batik is the idea that every created thing is a name of God showing itself, which is close to what my mother said about the old motifs.

  2. Imam Bilal Hussain

    I have read it three times in Arabic and taught it once, which I will not do again without a commentary on the table. Some chapters are profound, some I cannot square with what I understand of the Qur'an, and the scholars who argued over it for seven centuries were not fools on either side. Read it, but read its critics too.