Skip to content
Coordinates of ThoughtHome of Philosophy
Join

Book corner · Beginner

The Art of War

Sunzi bingfa (孫子兵法)

Attributed to Sunzi (Sun Wu) · c. 5th–4th century BCE (compiled) · Short (under 150 pages)

4.0 from 2 reviews · 29 views

+ Add to my shelf

Be the first to put it on your shelf.

What it is

A treatise on military strategy in thirteen short chapters, traditionally attributed to Sun Wu, a general said to have served the state of Wu around 500 BCE; most scholars think the text took shape somewhat later, in the Warring States period. It begins by calling war a matter of life and death for the state, to be entered only after careful calculation. Its central ideas are that the best victory is won without fighting, by defeating the enemy's plans and alliances; that all warfare is based on deception; that knowing the enemy and knowing oneself is the condition of safety in battle; and that a commander should exploit strategic advantage (shi), the potential energy of a situation, like round boulders rolled down a mountain, rather than relying on brute force. A bamboo text found at Yinqueshan in 1972 confirmed the antiquity of the core work.

Why read it

It is the classic case for war as a costly last resort governed by intelligence rather than courage, and its idea of strategic advantage contains a philosophy of action that reaches well beyond the battlefield.

Where to start

Read chapters 1 to 3 on calculation, waging war and attack by stratagem, then chapter 5 on shi; Roger Ames's translation draws on the bamboo-text material.

Original text in the public domain; free translations exist online

Reviews

  1. Huang Wei-ting

    As a game designer I keep returning to chapter 5. Shi is not force but position, the boulder at the top of the slope, and good design is about building positions players can exploit. I read it once as a business-book teenager and hated it; reading it as a philosophy of situations was a different experience.

  2. Choi Byeong-hun

    Twenty-two years in the army and this was on every reading list, usually reduced to slogans. Read whole, it is a sober book: war ruins states, long wars ruin them faster, and a general who wins without fighting deserves more credit than one who wins a famous battle. It has almost nothing to say about the justice of war, which is why I read it next to the just war theorists, not instead of them.