Skip to content
Coordinates of ThoughtHome of Philosophy
Join

Book corner · Intermediate

Politics

Politika (Πολιτικά)

Aristotle · 4th century BCE · Medium (150–350 pages)

4.5 from 2 reviews · 33 views

+ Add to my shelf

Be the first to put it on your shelf.

What it is

Aristotle's study of the city-state (polis), in eight books, probably assembled from lecture material. Book I argues that the city exists by nature and that the human being is by nature a political animal, able to share speech about what is just and unjust; it also contains his defence of natural slavery, which almost all readers now reject, and an analysis of household management and of money-making without limit. Book II criticises earlier proposals, including the shared property and families of Plato's Republic. The middle books ask what a citizen is, classify constitutions by whether one, few or many rule and whether they rule for the common good or their own, and examine democracy and oligarchy in detail, praising a constitution weighted toward the middle class. The last books sketch the best city and the education its citizens need, including music.

Why read it

It is the first systematic comparison of political regimes, and its questions about citizenship, the middle class and who should rule are still the questions political science asks.

Where to start

Read Book I chapters 1 and 2 for the political animal, then Book III on citizenship and the classification of constitutions.

Original text in the public domain; free translations exist online

Reviews

  1. Deepa Nair

    Our constitutional theory class read Book III alongside Ambedkar's speeches. Aristotle's question, whether the virtue of a good citizen and of a good man are the same, is sharper than it first looks, because the answer depends on the constitution. His mixed regime gave me a vocabulary for why constitutions distrust both the rich few and the passionate many.

  2. Javier Morales

    As an economist I go straight to Book I on wealth-getting, where Aristotle distinguishes acquisition for the household from money-making that knows no limit. It is the oldest critique of that kind I know, and Marx read it closely. The argument for natural slavery is indefensible and should be taught as such, but Book IV's case for a large middle class reads as if it were written for us.