Skip to content
Coordinates of ThoughtHome of Philosophy
Join

Book corner · Intermediate

On the Creation of the World

De opificio mundi (Περὶ τῆς κατὰ Μωυσέα κοσμοποιίας)

Philo of Alexandria · early 1st century CE · Short (under 150 pages)

4.5 from 2 reviews · 46 views

+ Add to my shelf

Be the first to put it on your shelf.

What it is

Philo's treatise on the opening chapters of Genesis, written in Greek by a leading member of Alexandria's Jewish community. It reads the creation story with the help of Greek philosophy, especially Plato's Timaeus. Moses, Philo argues, begins his law with creation because the law of the Torah is in harmony with the law of nature. The six days are not periods of time but an expression of order, six being a perfect number. Before making the visible world God conceived an intelligible world, which exists in the divine Logos as the plan of a city exists in the mind of its architect. Philo distinguishes the human made 'in the image' in Genesis 1 from the moulded earthly human of Genesis 2, praises the number seven, and reads the Garden and the serpent as allegories of mind, sense and pleasure. He ends with five lessons, among them that God exists and is one and exercises providence.

Why read it

It is the first sustained attempt to read scripture with philosophy, and its method was taken up far more by Christian interpreters than by later Jewish ones, a story worth knowing in itself.

Where to start

Read the opening sections on the architect and the intelligible world, then the allegory of the Garden; David Runia's translation and commentary is the best guide.

Original text in the public domain; free translations exist online

Reviews

  1. Nikos Stavridis

    The Greek Fathers drew on Philo, and reading him explains much of what puzzled me in their writings on creation. The number symbolism will lose most modern readers. The distinction between the two creations of the human being, by contrast, still sets the agenda for theological anthropology.

  2. Miriam Adler

    Philo is the forgotten ancestor in my classroom. The rabbis did not preserve him, the Church did, and Jewish readers rediscovered him late. Yet the move he makes here, reading Genesis alongside the Timaeus, is the move Maimonides would make more than a thousand years later in a different key. The architect image alone is worth the hour.