Skip to content
Coordinates of ThoughtHome of Philosophy
Join

Book corner · Advanced

Light of the Lord

Or Hashem (אור ה׳)

Hasdai Crescas · 1410 · Long (over 350 pages)

4.0 from 2 reviews · 26 views

+ Add to my shelf

Be the first to put it on your shelf.

What it is

The main philosophical work of Hasdai Crescas, a leading rabbi of Aragon, completed in 1410, two decades after the anti-Jewish riots of 1391 in which his son was killed. Written in Hebrew, it is a systematic account of Jewish belief and a direct challenge to the Aristotelianism of Maimonides. In its first part Crescas examines the premises of Aristotelian physics that Maimonides had used to prove God's existence, and argues that an actual infinite is possible, that a void can exist, and that place is extension rather than the boundary of a containing body, so that several of the proofs fail. He then reorganises the principles of faith, holding that God's perfection lies in love and joy rather than intellect alone, and develops a view of human choice that admits causal determination while preserving responsibility. Spinoza knew the work, and Harry Wolfson's study made its physics famous among historians of science.

Why read it

It is the most powerful medieval critique of Aristotle's physics from within a religious tradition, and its treatment of infinity and of free will repays comparison with Spinoza.

Where to start

Read the critique of the Aristotelian propositions in Book I, ideally through Harry Wolfson's Crescas' Critique of Aristotle, before the theological books.

Original text in the public domain

Reviews

  1. Lars Eriksen

    A physicist reading a fifteenth-century rabbi on the void and the infinite expects to be patient. I ended up taking notes. Crescas sees that Aristotle's arguments against the void and the infinite depend on assumptions about natural place that need not hold, which is roughly what early modern physics concluded. I leaned on Wolfson's study for most of it, and I am glad I did.

  2. Pieter de Jong

    I came to Crescas because Spinoza mentions him in his letter on the infinite. It was worth the detour: Crescas's argument that an actual infinite is coherent reads startlingly modern, and his account of choice as caused yet still ours is a kind of compatibilism before the word existed. The theological books lost me in places, but the first book is a revelation.