There is no self: the Buddhist and Humean bundle views are basically right
DebateFor 2 · Against 47 replies
Activity last 6 months
Debates 1
Questions 2
Discussions 2
Reading groups 1
Recent replies
- Wu wei for burnt-out founders: what did Laozi actually mean?
Edward Slingerland's Trying Not to Try (2014) is about exactly this, linking wu wei to research on spontaneity and skill. The idea is less "do nothing" than acting so skilfully and natu…
- What does Merleau-Ponty mean by the “lived body”?
The claim is that the body is not one object among others that I happen to own, but the standpoint from which there are objects at all. I don't perceive my body the way I perceive a table: I perc…
- Is evolution compatible with objective morality?
Some realists, like Parfit, argued that our capacity for reasoning, which evolution gave us for other purposes, can grasp moral truths, just as it grasps mathematics. Evolution gave us general intelli…
- Zhuangzi’s happy fish: can we know what others feel?
For other minds, I like the "standing above the Hao" reading: knowledge of other beings is always from a situated perspective, through engagement, not from nowhere. That's surprisingly…
- Introspection is too unreliable to ground a science of consciousness
Nisbett and Wilson is a strong result, but it concerns causes, not experience. People are bad at saying why they did something. Whether they're bad at saying what they're experiencing right…