Skip to content
Coordinates of ThoughtHome of Philosophy
Join

Card 6.26 · Root VI — The Philosophy of X Family

Philosophy of Food

Can you be wrong about what tastes good?

Philosophy of food asks whether taste can be cultivated, whether eating carries meaning, and what ethical weight attaches to what we eat.

From The Coordinates of Thought by Syed Raheel Shahzad, card 6.26, page 328

On this card
  1. Where it sits
  2. The rival answers
  3. Key figures
  4. Connections
  5. On Coordinates of Thought

Where it sits

Under VI. Philosophy of X. Borders 5.7 Everyday aesthetics, 5.3 Taste and judgement, 3.3.6 Animal ethics, 6.31.

The rival answers

PositionClaim
Gustatory subjectivismTaste is preference; there is nothing to be right about
Aesthetic cognitivism about foodFood admits of genuine appreciation and expertise
Hierarchical exclusionTaste and smell are lower senses, incapable of aesthetic judgement
Cultural constitutionWhat tastes good is constituted by tradition and practice
Ethical gastronomyEating is inseparable from its moral context

Key figures

FigureDatesTraditionContribution
Plato428–348 BCEGreekAppetite as the lowest part of the soul
Ibn Butland. 1066IslamicTaqwim al-Sihha; food within a framework of regimen
Brillat-Savarin1755–1826FrenchGastronomy as a subject of serious study
Carolyn Korsmeyerb. 1950AnalyticTaste as a genuinely aesthetic sense

Connections

→ 5.7, 5.3 · ↔ 3.3.6, 6.31, 3.3.2 · ◇ aesthetic cognitivism, cultural constitution · ○ Axial Age; Islamic golden age; Modern; Table 10

→ narrower questions · ↔ questions it borders · ◇ the positions, mapped in Part III of the book · ○ the eras and comparison tables (Parts IV and V)

The full card is in the book

In The Coordinates of Thought this card goes on to a worked example that sets the answers against one case, and to where the question touches daily life — page 328.

About the book Get the book

On Coordinates of Thought

Conversations about this question in Food & taste:

Join free to ask about it Everything in Food & taste