Skip to content
Coordinates of ThoughtHome of Philosophy
Join

Card 6.14 · Root VI — The Philosophy of X Family

Philosophy of Psychology

Can a science study something only one person can observe?

Philosophy of psychology asks whether and how inner life can be studied scientifically, and what psychology's concepts refer to.

From The Coordinates of Thought by Syed Raheel Shahzad, card 6.14, page 300

On this card
  1. Where it sits
  2. The recurring problems
  3. Where do you stand?
  4. Key figures
  5. Talk about it here
  6. Connections

Where it sits

Under VI. Philosophy of X. Borders 1.3 Philosophy of mind, 6.8 Philosophy of science, 6.13 Philosophy of medicine.

New to the fields of philosophy? Read the guide

The recurring problems

ProblemThe question
IntrospectionWhether first-person report is evidence, and how reliable
ReductionWhether psychological explanation reduces to neuroscience
Natural kindsWhether diagnostic categories carve anything real
Folk psychologyWhether belief and desire talk is a theory that could be false
ReplicationWhat the replication crisis shows about the field's methods
OperationalisationWhether a measure measures the construct or replaces it

Where do you stand?

Can a science study something only one person can observe?

One tap, no sign-up. You can change your answer at any time. Answers are counted anonymously.

Key figures

FigureDatesTraditionContribution
Ibn Sina980–1037IslamicSystematic faculty psychology
William James1842–1910AmericanIntrospection defended with awareness of its limits
B. F. Skinner1904–1990AmericanRadical behaviourism
Paul Churchlandb. 1942AnalyticEliminative materialism about folk psychology
Jerry Fodor1935–2017AnalyticSpecial sciences are not reducible; modularity

Talk about it here

Conversations about this question in Psychology & the mind sciences:

Join free to ask about it Everything in Psychology & the mind sciences

Connections

→ 1.3, 6.8 · ↔ 6.13, 1.3.4, 3.4, 6.15 · ◇ eliminative materialism, functionalism, behaviourism · ○ Islamic golden age; Modern; Table 2

→ depends on · ↔ borders: genuine overlap, neither prior · ◇ answered by: points from question to answers · ○ appears in: points to the timeline and the comparisons

The full card is in the book

In The Coordinates of Thought this card goes on to a worked example that sets the answers against one case, and to where the question touches daily life — page 300.

About the book Get the book