Skip to content
Coordinates of ThoughtHome of Philosophy
Join

Thinker

Enrique Dussel

FollowStart a topic about Enrique Dussel

Also known as Enrique Domingo Dussel Ambrosini

1934 – 2023 · Mendoza, Mexico City

Traditions: Latin American

Schools: Philosophy of liberation

In brief

Enrique Dussel (1934–2023) was an Argentine-born philosopher who spent most of his working life in Mexico. He was one of the Argentine founders of the philosophy of liberation in the early 1970s, alongside Arturo Andrés Roig and Horacio Cerutti-Guldberg, and he did most to spread it beyond Latin America. His starting point is that European philosophy advanced at the expense of most of humanity, whose poverty it rarely treated as a philosophical subject. Drawing on Emmanuel Levinas, he argued that ethics begins with the 'Other' who stands outside a dominant system: the poor, the colonised, the excluded. He later dated modernity from the conquest of the Americas in 1492 and built a large-scale ethics and politics of liberation.

In depth Last reviewed

Connections

Places
Mexico City taught, died
Tradition
Latin AmericanPhilosophy of liberation
Influences
7 sourced relationships

Life

Dussel was born on 24 December 1934 in La Paz, in the province of Mendoza, Argentina. From 1953 to 1957 he studied philosophy at the National University of Cuyo in Mendoza. He then went to Madrid, where he took a doctorate in philosophy at the Complutense University in 1959. For the next two years he lived in Nazareth, in Israel, with the community of the priest Paul Gauthier, working as a carpenter and learning Hebrew and Arabic. In 1961 he moved to Paris to study theology and history, and later researched in the Archive of the Indies in Seville. In 1967 he completed a doctorate in history on Spanish-American bishops who defended the Indians between 1504 and 1620. Back in Argentina he taught ethics in Mendoza from 1968, and in 1971 he read Levinas's Totality and Infinity. On the night of 2–3 October 1973 his home was bombed by right-wing extremists, and he was accused of being a 'Marxist'. He was expelled from his university in March 1975 and went into exile in Mexico that August. There he taught at the Autonomous Metropolitan University (Iztapalapa) and, from 1976, at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), where he became professor emeritus. In 1976 he also began a systematic reading of Marx. He wrote more than fifty books and died in Mexico City on 5 November 2023.

Problems

  • Can there be a philosophy that starts from the poor and the excluded rather than from the centre of power?
  • Is it possible to think beyond a system's own terms, from outside it?
  • When did modernity begin, and what did conquest and colonialism have to do with it?
  • Is European philosophy universal, or a regional tradition that mistook itself for the whole?
  • What principles should guide an ethics and a politics that take the victims of a system seriously?

Core ideas

Totality, exteriority and the analectic method

Dussel describes any established social or intellectual order as a 'totality': a closed whole that measures everything by its own standards. What it cannot absorb lies in its 'exteriority'. The people in that position are the 'Other': those who are defeated, overlooked or excluded, such as the colonised or the poor. Following Levinas, he holds that ethics starts when the Other's demand interrupts the system. The IEP explains that he calls his method 'analectical' to contrast it with 'the totalizing tendencies of the Hegelian dialectic'. The analectic instead tries to listen to what comes from beyond the system. A general objection is that no one speaks from a pure outside: the excluded also belong to traditions and systems of their own, so it is unclear how exteriority can be identified without already interpreting it.

Philosophy from the underside of history

According to the IEP, Dussel argues that European philosophy's progress came at the expense of most of humanity, whose poverty rarely became a philosophical theme. Latin America, on this view, suffers two linked kinds of dependence: cultural and intellectual dependence on Europe and North America, and economic and social oppression. Liberation has to address both. That is why Dussel calls for a global dialogue in which the least heard are listened to on their own terms, rather than translated into the categories of the centre. The SEP notes that the movement owed much to dependency theory, which links poverty in the periphery to its place in the world economy. An objection reported in the SEP comes from Manuel Vargas: for all its condemnation of Eurocentrism, the philosophy of liberation 'too is Eurocentric'. One obvious ground for the charge is its heavy reliance on European thinkers such as Hegel, Marx and Levinas.

Modernity begins in 1492

In 1492: El encubrimiento del otro (1992; English as The Invention of the Americas, 1995), Dussel rejects the usual story that modernity is a purely European achievement. He calls that story the 'myth of modernity'. For him modernity begins when Europe opened to the Atlantic and conquered the Americas. The encounter with the peoples of the Americas helped create 'Europe' as a concept and helped Europe present itself as the centre of history. Scholars sum up his thesis with a contrast: the 'I conquer' (ego conquiro) of the conquistador came before Descartes's 'I think' (ego cogito) of 1637. The Cartesian subject, on this reading, presupposed a world already treated as an object to be mastered. Linda Martín Alcoff notes that Dussel's large-scale history of modernity can look 'just as impossibly grandiose' as Hegel's.

Transmodernity

Dussel does not ask Latin America simply to catch up with modernity, nor to reject it in favour of a lost past. His alternative is 'transmodernity'. Alcoff explains it as a planetary view that shows the global networks within which European modernity became possible, against Europe's 'myth of autogenesis', the idea that it made itself. Transmodernity aims to bring back the cultures that modernity pushed to the margins, so that they can take part as partners, not as copies. It grows through 'transversal' intercultural dialogue, meaning dialogue between peripheral cultures and not only among elites. UNAM describes the proposal as a critique of Hellenocentrism, Eurocentrism and Westernism. Alcoff identifies an open problem: any overall standard for deciding who is included in a 'pluriversal' world seems to contradict the idea of many equal worlds.

An ethics of liberation

Dussel's main later work, Ethics of Liberation in the Age of Globalization and Exclusion (1998), begins with a world history of ethics. It argues that the great moral traditions did not simply start in Greece and pass through Europe and North America. It then builds a series of principles: a material principle of ethics, a formal principle of morality concerned with valid agreement between people, and a principle of feasibility. These lead to an ethical-critical principle and a principle of liberation. The formal side was worked out in long debate with the discourse ethics of Karl-Otto Apel. The book places victims and their communities at the centre of ethics. Michael Barber's study reports critical responses to Dussel's idea of rationality, including from Apel. An open question is how the material and formal principles are to be weighed when they conflict.

Politics of liberation

In Twenty Theses on Politics (2006; English 2008), Dussel offers a short theory of political power for movements opposed to neoliberal globalisation. He distinguishes potentia, the power of the political community itself, from potestas, the institutions to which that power is delegated. Power exercised as obedience to the community he calls 'obediential' power. When officials treat institutional power as their own, he speaks of the 'fetishisation of power', which turns politics into domination. The second part of the book discusses 'the people', populism, and hyperpotentia, the power of the excluded in a state of rebellion, and it considers reform, transformation and revolution. The book engages with Marx, Hegel, Habermas, Rawls and Negri. A general objection is that appeals to 'the people' can be claimed by any movement, so it is unclear how to tell genuine obediential power from a leader who simply says he speaks for the people.

Works

  • Para una ética de la liberación latinoamericana (For an Ethics of Latin American Liberation), vol. 1 1973The first volume of his early ethics, published in the year his house was bombed.
  • Filosofía de la liberación (Philosophy of Liberation) 1977; English 1985Written in Mexican exile, from memory and without a bibliography, according to his own chronology. The IEP calls it his best-known early work; it sets out totality, exteriority and the analectic method.
  • La producción teórica de Marx (Marx's Theoretical Production) 1985A commentary on Marx's Grundrisse, the first of three books on Marx's manuscripts, followed by Hacia un Marx desconocido (1988) and El último Marx (1990).
  • 1492: El encubrimiento del otro (English: The Invention of the Americas) 1992; English 1995Argues that modernity began with the conquest of the Americas and that the conquest helped create Europe's image of itself.
  • Ética de la liberación en la edad de la globalización y la exclusión (Ethics of Liberation in the Age of Globalization and Exclusion) 1998; English 2013His main systematic work: a world history of ethics followed by material, formal, feasibility, critical and liberation principles. English edition by Duke University Press, edited by Alejandro A. Vallega.
  • 20 tesis de política (Twenty Theses on Politics) 2006; English 2008A short theory of political power: potentia and potestas, obediential power, the fetishisation of power and liberation. Translated by Geo Maher, with a foreword by Eduardo Mendieta.
  • Politics of Liberation: A Critical Global History English 2011A world history of political thought from the standpoint of the periphery, listed by the IEP.

Influences and relationships

7 sourced relationships. Open one to read why, and the source.

Shaped or answered Enrique Dussel 4

  • Influenced byKarl Marx1818 – 1883

    In Mexican exile from 1976 Dussel began a systematic reading of Marx, which produced three books on Marx's manuscripts (1985, 1988, 1990) and a book on Marx's theological metaphors (1993).

    Source: docs.enriquedussel.com · stated on the profile of Enrique Dussel

    Karl Marx’s relationships

  • Influenced byEmmanuel Levinas1906 – 1995

    Dussel read Levinas's Totality and Infinity in 1971. The IEP says Levinas influenced his 'analectical' ethical method, and Roberto Follari shows how Dussel, drawing on Levinas's idea of the Other, set 'exteriority' against totality.

    Source: Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy · stated on the profile of Enrique Dussel

    Emmanuel Levinas’s relationships

  • Criticised byLinda Martín Alcoffno profile yet

    Alcoff (2000) found the philosophy of liberation insufficiently attentive to how identity categories work, and later questioned whether Dussel's large history of modernity sits well with his call for many worlds.

    Source: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy · stated on the profile of Enrique Dussel

  • Criticised byOfelia Schutteno profile yet

    The SEP reports Schutte's criticism (1993) that the movement's proponents failed to address gender and sexuality adequately; Alcoff also lists her among critics of Dussel's broad collective 'we'.

    Source: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy · stated on the profile of Enrique Dussel

Enrique Dussel answered 3

  • CriticisedG. W. F. Hegel1770 – 1831

    Dussel set his 'analectical' method against the Hegelian dialectic, which he saw as tending to absorb everything into one totality; the IEP notes the contrast. His early works include a book on the Hegelian dialectic (1972).

    Source: Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy · stated on the profile of Enrique Dussel

    G. W. F. Hegel’s relationships

  • CriticisedJürgen Habermas1929 – 2026

    His chronology records a long dialogue and debate with Habermas's theory of communicative action from 1989; the SEP lists Habermas among the European philosophers he engaged.

    Source: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy · stated on the profile of Enrique Dussel

    Jürgen Habermas’s relationships

  • CriticisedKarl-Otto Apelno profile yet

    From 1989 Dussel carried on a long debate with Apel's discourse ethics, and the two published a joint volume on ethics and the philosophy of liberation in 1992. Barber's study records Apel's critical responses to Dussel.

    Source: docs.enriquedussel.com · stated on the profile of Enrique Dussel

Reception

Military repression in Argentina from 1976 to 1983 scattered the founders of the philosophy of liberation and split the movement. In Mexico Dussel became its best-known voice abroad. The SEP says he was mainly responsible for spreading it outside Latin America, through exchanges with Apel, Ricoeur and Habermas in Europe and with Rorty, Charles Taylor, Alcoff and Eduardo Mendieta in the United States. It also says the movement arguably had more impact outside Latin America than any other Latin American philosophical development, even though analytic philosophers have largely ignored or dismissed it. UNAM describes his decolonising turn as a guide for new generations of thinkers. Duke University Press calls Ethics of Liberation his masterwork. Critics such as Schutte, Cerutti-Guldberg, Alcoff and Vargas questioned his treatment of identity and gender, his sweeping history and his reliance on European sources.

Disputed interpretations

Is the philosophy of liberation itself Eurocentric?

Dussel condemns Eurocentrism, yet his key tools come from Hegel, Marx and Levinas. Manuel Vargas argued, as the SEP reports, that the movement 'too is Eurocentric'. A general reply open to him is that using European ideas from the periphery, and changing them, is not the same as treating Europe as the measure of all thought.

A new grand narrative?

Critics including Cerutti-Guldberg, Schutte and Santiago Castro-Gómez argue that Dussel's world history and his collective 'we' repeat the large modern stories he criticises. Alcoff defends him, arguing that provisional global narratives need not be totalising, but she admits a tension between any overall standard of inclusion and the idea of a 'pluriversal' world.

Who is 'the Other'?

Dussel speaks of the poor, the people and the victims as the place from which critique begins. Schutte argued that the movement neglected gender and sexuality, and Alcoff that it paid too little attention to how identity categories work. Scholars disagree about whether these categories can be refined or are too broad to bear the weight he puts on them.

Primary texts

Sources

Scholarly sources and reference works, free to read online.

Guides

In the Book corner

  • Philosophy of Liberation 1977 · Advanced
    Dussel's systematic statement of the philosophy of liberation, written in numbered sections after his exile from Argentina to Mexico. It begins with…

In the conversation

No topics yet. Start one about this thinker.

On the Atlas

See on the Atlas Who else was alive then?

Cite this page

Written and kept up to date by the Coordinates of Thought editors. Each statement was checked against the sources listed above before publishing; this page is not peer-reviewed. Last updated 28 October 2026. How to cite this site.

APA (7th edition)

Coordinates of Thought Editors. (2026, October 28). Enrique Dussel. Coordinates of Thought. Retrieved [date accessed], from https://coordinatesofthought.com/thinker/enrique-dussel/

MLA (9th edition)

“Enrique Dussel.” Coordinates of Thought, 28 Oct. 2026, coordinatesofthought.com/thinker/enrique-dussel/. Accessed [date accessed].

Chicago (17th edition)

Coordinates of Thought Editors. “Enrique Dussel.” Coordinates of Thought. Last modified October 28, 2026. https://coordinatesofthought.com/thinker/enrique-dussel/.

BibTeX

@misc{cot-enrique-dussel-2026,
  author       = {{Coordinates of Thought Editors}},
  title        = {Enrique Dussel},
  howpublished = {Coordinates of Thought},
  year         = {2026},
  month        = oct,
  url          = {https://coordinatesofthought.com/thinker/enrique-dussel/},
  note         = {Last updated 28 October 2026}
}

RIS

TY  - ELEC
AU  - Coordinates of Thought Editors
TI  - Enrique Dussel
T2  - Coordinates of Thought
PB  - Coordinates of Thought
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/28
UR  - https://coordinatesofthought.com/thinker/enrique-dussel/
LA  - en
ER  -

For reference managers (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote): BibTeX file · RIS file

Where next

  1. On the Atlas · where they taughtMexico CitySee the place, century by century, and who else was there.

Tradition: Latin American philosophyThinkers A–Z