Skip to content
Coordinates of ThoughtHome of Philosophy
Join
Debate

Thesis The “three faiths in harmony” story about Córdoba does more harm than good, even as a hopeful myth

Where it stands

Four days a week I walk tourists from the Mezquita-Catedral to the old Jewish quarter. Most of them arrive wanting one story: in medieval Córdoba, Muslims, Jews and Christians lived together in harmony, and we have since forgotten how.

The facts are more interesting. Maimonides was born here in 1138, and his family left after the Almohads took the city in the 1140s. They lived for a time in Fez and ended up in Egypt. Ibn Rushd, also born here, served as a judge and court physician, and then in the 1190s fell from favour, saw his teaching condemned and was briefly banished to Lucena. Jews and Christians under Muslim rule had a protected status, the dhimma, which was real protection and real subordination at once. The word convivencia itself comes from a twentieth-century Spanish historian, Américo Castro.

My thesis: the harmony story does more harm than good. It makes tolerance look like a golden age that happened once, under special conditions, instead of a hard and partial legal arrangement that people built, defended and sometimes lost. A myth that hides the work teaches people nothing about how to do the work.

But I see the other side every day: the faces of visitors from three faiths standing in the same courtyard. Persuade me either way.

LikeReplyFollow4 replies

Join the conversation: members reply here, and joining is free. Reading is always free.

Join free to reply Sign in

4 replies

For the thesis 2

  1. Youssef Berrada

    For Fellow

    For. I teach history in Fes, where Maimonides' family stayed for some years after leaving Córdoba, and I see what the golden-age story does in a classroom. It turns history into decoration. Students learn that once upon a time things were good, and they learn nothing about why they were good when they were, or why they stopped.

    Ibn Khaldun would say that a story which cannot explain its own ending is not history at all.

  2. Rafael Lucena Prieto

    For Fellow

    Eliana, I'm going to steal that for tomorrow's tour. But I'll keep my side. The word harmony is what does the damage. Ha-Nagid and the massacre together don't describe harmony. They describe a society where coexistence was real, valuable and fragile. That is a better story, and it isn't the myth.

Against the thesis 2

  1. Tal Rosen

    Against Fellow

    Against. Strip away the harmony and something real is still there. Hebrew poetry had its golden age in al-Andalus, written by men who read Arabic poetry and used its metres. Samuel ha-Nagid was vizier in Granada and commanded its armies. Saadia, Halevi and Maimonides wrote philosophy in Arabic.

    That isn't a myth. It's a culture that two languages built together. The story may simplify it, but it points at something that happened, which is more than most hopeful myths can say.

  2. Eliana Halpern

    Against Fellow

    Against, but with a suggestion for the tour. Keep both on the page, as the Talmud keeps the losing opinion. Tell them about Samuel ha-Nagid. Then tell them that in 1066 his son Joseph was killed in Granada in a massacre of the city's Jews.

    Visitors can carry two facts at once. The myth only does harm when it is told instead of the history. Told alongside it, it becomes a question: what made the good years possible, and what ended them?