Card 4.2 · Root IV — Logic
Informal Logic
Why does formal logic tell you so little about whether an argument is any good?
Informal logic studies reasoning as it occurs in ordinary language, where arguments are incomplete, premises are unstated, and conclusions are supported rather than guaranteed.
Where it sits
Under IV. Logic. Contains 4.2.1 Fallacies, 4.2.2 Argumentation theory, 4.2.3 Rhetoric. Borders 2.6 Rationality, 2.8 Formal epistemology.
Narrower questions under this one:
- 4.2.1 Fallacies When is a bad-looking argument actually bad?
- 4.2.2 Argumentation Theory What does an argument have to do, besides be valid?
- 4.2.3 Rhetoric Is persuading someone different from giving them a reason?
The core distinctions
| Distinction | What it separates |
|---|---|
| Deductive vs defeasible | Conclusion guaranteed, against conclusion defeasible by new information |
| Argument vs explanation | Establishing that something is so, against saying why it is so |
| Enthymeme | An argument with a premise left unstated because it is assumed |
| Burden of proof | Who must argue, and what the default is if they fail |
| Charity | Reading an argument in its strongest available form |
Key figures
| Figure | Dates | Tradition | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aristotle | 384–322 BCE | Greek | Topics and Sophistical Refutations; dialectical reasoning |
| The Nyaya school | c. 2nd c. CE onward | Indian | Formal rules of debate; categories of illegitimate move |
| Stephen Toulmin | 1922–2009 | Analytic | A model of argument structure fitting actual practice |
| Douglas Walton | 1942–2020 | Analytic | Argumentation schemes and critical questions |
Connections
→ 4.1 · ↔ 4.2.1, 4.2.2, 2.6, 2.7.1 · ◇ informal logic, argumentation theory · ○ Axial Age; Classical; Modern; Table 3
→ narrower questions · ↔ questions it borders · ◇ the positions, mapped in Part III of the book · ○ the eras and comparison tables (Parts IV and V)
The full card is in the book
In The Coordinates of Thought this card goes on to a worked example that sets the answers against one case, and to where the question touches daily life — page 189.
On Coordinates of Thought
Conversations about this question in Logic & argument:
- Vitaṇḍā is not always illegitimate: a critic with no thesis can still be doing philosophy 7 replies
- Quine was right that even logic could be revised in the light of experience 6 replies
- Reading group: the first book of the Nyāya Sūtra with Vātsyāyana’s commentary 6 replies
- Keep the losing opinion on the page: what the Talmud could teach an online forum 6 replies
- Reading group: Toulmin’s The Uses of Argument, starting from the middle 6 replies