Skip to content
Coordinates of ThoughtHome of Philosophy
Join

Book corner · Advanced

Summa of Logic

Summa logicae

William of Ockham · c. 1323 · Long (over 350 pages)

4.5 from 2 reviews · 37 views

+ Add to my shelf

Be the first to put it on your shelf.

What it is

Ockham's comprehensive textbook of logic, in three parts: on terms, on propositions, and on arguments, the last covering syllogisms, consequences, demonstration and fallacies. The first part contains his philosophy of language and much of his metaphysics. Spoken and written words signify by convention, but they are subordinated to concepts in the mind, which make up a natural mental language. Universals are not things existing outside the mind but signs: concepts that can be predicated of many individuals. Through the theory of supposition, which explains what a term stands for in a given proposition, Ockham shows how to read statements about universals, categories and abstract nouns without positing extra entities, and he argues that of Aristotle's ten categories only substances and qualities correspond to distinct things. The result is the most thorough statement of medieval nominalism.

Why read it

It is the masterpiece of medieval logic and the clearest example of how a theory of language can be used to economise on what exists.

Where to start

Read the opening chapters of Part I on signs and terms and the chapters on universals, in Michael Loux's translation, Ockham's Theory of Terms.

Original text in the public domain

Reviews

  1. Oskar Nyberg

    I read it for the mental language, Ockham's most original idea: thought has a grammar of its own, prior to any spoken tongue. Fodor's language of thought has an ancestor here. The theory of supposition takes patience, and many examples are Latin sentences whose point fades in English, but the reward is seeing nominalism done properly rather than by slogan.

  2. Tomasz Wójcik

    Medieval logic is underrated by people who think logic began in 1879, and this is the best evidence. The theory of supposition is a real semantics, worked out without symbols but with great care. I teach the chapters on universals alongside modern nominalists and students are surprised how little has been added. The translation situation is patchy: Parts I and II are in English, Part III only in part.