The free will defence cannot explain natural evil
DebateFor 3 · Against 49 replies
Activity last 6 months
Debates 1
Questions 2
Discussions 2
Recent replies
- Is “Islamic philosophy” a useful label?
The same problem arises with "Christian philosophy". Nobody quite knows whether it means philosophy done by Christians or philosophy that's Christian in content. Maybe the labels only w…
- Fes, al-Qarawiyyin, and how medieval students learned to argue
In medieval European universities, the disputatio was central. Aquinas's Summa is written in its form: objections, a counter-statement, the answer, then replies to the objections. Starting with t…
- Teaching the Euthyphro to sixteen-year-olds: what works and what doesn’t?
I was one of those students not long ago. What helped me was being shown the classical theist reply: God's will isn't arbitrary because it follows from his nature, and his nature is goodness…
- Does a deterministic program “choose”?
I'd say the engine doesn't choose because it doesn't care about winning. Choice involves wanting something and being responsible for the result. The engine has a scoring function, not d…
- Rumi and Spinoza: are they describing the same God?
As a Christian I find Rumi far closer to the mystics I know, like Teresa of Ávila and John of the Cross. Spinoza is closer to a philosopher's God. The question might be the old one about the God…