Abduction (inference to the best explanation)
On this page
Inferring that a hypothesis is probably true because it would best explain the evidence in front of you.
Also: abduction, inference to the best explanation, IBE, abductive reasoning, retroduction
What it means
Abduction reasons from evidence to the explanation that would best account for it. Seeing breadcrumbs, a plate and jam on the kitchen table, you conclude that a housemate had a midnight snack. Astronomers inferred an unseen planet, Neptune, to explain irregularities in the orbit of Uranus. Charles Sanders Peirce introduced the term, chiefly for the step of forming a new hypothesis; today it usually means justifying a belief by its explanatory power, a view defended at length by Peter Lipton. Unlike deduction, the conclusion can be overturned by further evidence. Critics such as Bas van Fraassen warn that the best explanation we have thought of may only be "the best of a bad lot".
The questions it belongs to
- 6.8.1 Scientific ExplanationWhen have you explained something, rather than just described it?
- 2.2 Sources of KnowledgeWhich ways of finding things out actually work?
Thinkers
- Charles Sanders Peirce
- Gilbert Harman
- Peter Lipton
- Bas van Fraassen