Skip to content
Coordinates of ThoughtHome of Philosophy
Join

Book corner · Beginner

The Questions of King Milinda

Milindapañha

Anonymous (dialogues of King Milinda and the monk Nāgasena) · c. 1st century BCE–1st century CE (with later additions) · Long (over 350 pages)

4.0 from 2 reviews · 21 views

+ Add to my shelf

Be the first to put it on your shelf.

What it is

A Pāli text presenting conversations between King Milinda, usually identified with the Indo-Greek king Menander I, who ruled in north-western India in the second century BCE, and the Buddhist monk Nāgasena. The king is a skilled debater, and his objections are used to explain Buddhist doctrine through vivid analogies. In the most famous exchange, Nāgasena says his name is only a conventional designation and compares himself to a chariot, which is neither its pole, axle, wheels nor body, nor something apart from them. Other questions ask whether the one reborn is the same as or different from the one who died (neither, like the flame of a lamp burning through the night), how rebirth occurs without a self passing over, how karma works, and why the Buddha's sayings seem to contradict one another. The early core is old; later books were added over time.

Why read it

It is the classic statement of the Buddhist no-self view as a reply to a sceptical outsider, and the chariot argument is still the standard starting point for treating persons as conventional constructions.

Where to start

Read the opening dialogues, with the chariot, the lamp and the questions on rebirth, which take only an evening.

Original text in the public domain; free translations exist online

Reviews

  1. Nima Tsering Gurung

    I read this on long evenings in tea houses, and trekkers laugh when I explain the chariot to them. A Greek-educated king pressing a monk with hard questions is a good shape for a book. The later sections repeat themselves and the dilemmas are uneven, but the early dialogues are as clear as anything in Buddhist philosophy.

  2. Giulia Ferrante

    A Greek king cross-examining a Buddhist monk was irresistible for someone who teaches Plato. Nāgasena's method is not Socratic, since he answers with analogies rather than questions, but the king plays a fine Meno. I tried the chariot passage with my students alongside the ship of Theseus and the class split almost exactly down the middle.