Skip to content
Coordinates of ThoughtHome of Philosophy
Join

Book corner · Philosophy · Beginner

Sage Philosophy: Indigenous Thinkers and Modern Debate on African Philosophy

H. Odera Oruka (editor) · 1990 · Medium (150–350 pages)

4.5 from 2 reviews

+ Add to my shelf

Be the first to put it on your shelf.

What it is

The Kenyan philosopher H. Odera Oruka's answer to the question whether there was philosophy in Africa before writing. Against both ethnophilosophy, which attributed a single worldview to whole peoples, and critics who held that philosophy requires a written tradition, Oruka set out to find individual thinkers in rural Kenya and record their views in conversation. He distinguishes folk sages, masters of their community's received wisdom, from philosophic sages, who reflect critically on that wisdom and sometimes reject it. The book presents interviews with sages from several Kenyan communities on questions such as God, death, justice and the good life, alongside Oruka's essays on method and on the main trends in African philosophy, and contributions by other scholars to the wider debate.

Why read it

It is the most sustained attempt to show philosophy at work in oral cultures without romanticising them, and its method of critical interview remains a model for comparative philosophy.

Where to start

Read Oruka's introduction and the distinction between folk and philosophic sages, then read several interviews and judge for yourself which side of the line each sage falls on.

Reviews

  1. Wanjiru Njenga

    I grew up in Nairobi hearing that philosophy was something done in Europe. Oruka went to the villages with a tape recorder and found people arguing, doubting and disagreeing with their own elders. The distinction between folk sage and philosophic sage is exactly the one I try to draw at work between a rule of thumb and a model you can criticise.

  2. Titilayo Adeyemi

    As someone who reads a lot on Yoruba epistemic vocabulary, I find Oruka's project both inspiring and methodologically worrying. The interviewer shapes the answers, and the transcripts are translations. Oruka was aware of this and discusses it, but the worry does not go away. Still the best book for students who think oral cultures cannot argue.