Skip to content
Coordinates of ThoughtHome of Philosophy
Join

Book corner · Philosophy · Beginner

Tannishō (A Record in Lament of Divergences)

Tannishō (歎異抄)

Yuien, recording the teaching of Shinran · late 13th century · Short (under 150 pages)

4.5 from 2 reviews

+ Add to my shelf

Be the first to put it on your shelf.

What it is

A short work in eighteen sections compiled by Yuien, a disciple of Shinran, the founder of Jōdo Shinshū (True Pure Land) Buddhism, some decades after his teacher's death. The first ten sections record sayings Yuien heard from Shinran; the rest lament, as the title says, views that had diverged from that teaching. Its central theme is reliance on other-power (tariki), the vow of Amida Buddha to save all beings, rather than self-power (jiriki), the attempt to earn awakening by one's own efforts. The most famous section turns ordinary moral expectation upside down: if even good people are born in the Pure Land, how much more so evil people, since those who know they cannot save themselves are the ones who truly rely on the vow. Shinran also says he has not a single disciple, and that he would have no regrets even if his own teacher had deceived him.

Why read it

It is one of the most widely read Japanese religious texts, and its radical account of grace, moral failure and humility has drawn comparisons with Luther and engaged modern philosophers such as Tanabe Hajime.

Where to start

Read the first ten sections in one sitting, then section 3 again; Taitetsu Unno's translation is clear and short.

Original text in the public domain

Reviews

  1. Rin Matsuda

    My grandmother kept this beside the family altar and read section 3 aloud whenever anyone in the family behaved badly, which confused me as a child. Reading it myself, I understood: the point is not that evil is fine but that no one gets to feel superior. It is a few dozen pages and I have never finished thinking about it.

  2. Aoife Kilbride

    I came to it because a lecturer called Shinran the Buddhist Luther. That turned out to be helpful and misleading. Reliance on another's power and distrust of one's own merit are familiar to a Catholic who has read Augustine, but there is no God here in my sense. Section 2, where Shinran says he would not regret being deceived by his teacher, unsettled me in a good way.