Skip to content
Coordinates of ThoughtHome of Philosophy
Join

Book corner · Philosophy · Advanced

Twenty Verses (with the Thirty Verses)

Viṃśatikā and Triṃśikā

Vasubandhu · c. 4th–5th century CE · Short (under 150 pages)

4.0 from 2 reviews

+ Add to my shelf

Be the first to put it on your shelf.

What it is

Two short verse works central to the Yogācāra school. The Twenty Verses, with Vasubandhu's own prose commentary, defend the thesis that what we experience is cognition only (vijñapti-mātra), without external objects. Vasubandhu answers four objections: if there are no external objects, why are experiences fixed in place and time, shared by many, and causally effective? Dreams show fixed places and real effects; the shared visions of beings in the hells show agreement without objects. He then argues that atoms cannot combine into extended things without either having parts or collapsing into a single point, so the realist's external world is incoherent. The Thirty Verses give the positive system: the storehouse consciousness (ālaya-vijñāna), the afflicted mind, the six active forms of awareness, and the three natures, imagined, dependent and perfected. Whether this Vasubandhu also wrote the Abhidharmakośa is debated.

Why read it

In a few pages it gives one of the sharpest arguments for idealism in any tradition, and comparing it with Berkeley shows how differently two idealisms can be motivated.

Where to start

Read the Twenty Verses with the autocommentary first, in a translation that includes it, then the Thirty Verses as the theory the arguments make room for.

Original text in the public domain

Reviews

  1. Lars Eriksen

    Coming from physics, I found the argument against atoms charming and beside the point: our atoms are not little extended bricks, so the dilemma about their sides does not bite. The dream argument is stronger than I expected. Three stars because the brevity forced me to rely on commentaries for nearly everything, and they disagree about whether this is idealism at all.

  2. Kenneth Lam Chi-ho

    The best twenty verses in Buddhist philosophy, and the autocommentary is where the argument lives. Newcomers want to call it Berkeley in Sanskrit, and that comparison is a false friend: Vasubandhu has no God holding experiences together, only karmic seeds. The argument against atoms in the second half is, to my mind, still not answered by his realist critics.