Skip to content
Coordinates of ThoughtHome of Philosophy
Join

Book corner · Philosophy · Advanced

Mīmāṃsā Sūtra

Mīmāṃsāsūtra

Attributed to Jaimini · c. 300–100 BCE (dates uncertain) · Long (over 350 pages)

4.5 from 2 reviews

+ Add to my shelf

Be the first to put it on your shelf.

What it is

The foundational text of Pūrva Mīmāṃsā, the school of Vedic exegesis, in twelve chapters of short aphorisms. It opens by announcing an inquiry into dharma and argues that dharma, what ought to be done, is known only through Vedic injunction, since perception and inference reach only what already exists, not what is to be done. To secure that authority it defends the eternity of the relation between word and meaning and, as later commentators developed it, the view that the Veda has no author, human or divine. Most of the work is a set of interpretive principles for ritual texts: how to tell injunctions from descriptive passages, how to rank conflicting kinds of textual evidence, and how procedures carry over from a model rite to its variants. Śabara's commentary, and the rival sub-commentaries of Kumārila and Prabhākara, made it a school of philosophy of language and epistemology.

Why read it

It is one of the most sophisticated theories of textual interpretation in the ancient world, and its rules shaped Indian law and hermeneutics long after many of the rituals themselves had faded.

Where to start

Read the first section of the first chapter with Śabara's commentary; it contains nearly all the epistemology.

Original text in the public domain

Reviews

  1. Khalid Mahmood Awan

    A friend in Varanasi told me that Mīmāṃsā is to Hindu law what uṣūl al-fiqh is to ours, and the comparison holds up better than I expected. Both ask how a command in a text is known to be a command, and what to do when two indications conflict. I read only the first chapters in translation and with help, so my judgement is limited, but I have rarely felt so at home in a foreign tradition.

  2. Govinda Prasad Upadhyaya

    My family has studied this text for five generations, and I still find new things in the first section. Students arrive thinking it is about ritual and leave having argued about whether a sentence can have an author. The rules for resolving conflicts in a text are as careful as any legal canon. Read Śabara with it; the sūtras alone are a skeleton.